Donika Pentcheva’s legal research was cited in Brief of Amici Curiae All Market Inc., Case-Mate Inc., General Mills, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., Mark Anthony International Srl, Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, LLC, Princeton Vanguard, LLC and Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. in Support of Converse, Inc. in a case pending before the United States Court of […]
Donika Pentcheva’s research involving intellectual property law has been cited in the Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, The University of Texas School of Law’s premier student-run law journal for cutting-edge, substantive legal issues in Intellectual Property, Patents and emerging technologies. The article is titled: “Rogue One: Section 285 Attorney’s Fees in Doctrinal Patent Ineligibility Cases.” […]
The Solicitor General, on behalf of the United States, petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari to review the judgments of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the following two cases: Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. and Polaris Innovations Limited v. Kingston […]
In an 8-1 majority decision, the United States Supreme Court held that adding “.com” to a generic name can create a protectable trademark. United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V. A generic name is the name of a class of products or services. Id. A term styled “generic.com” is a generic name for […]