An Inventor’s Sale of an Invention to a Third Party who is Obligated to Keep the Invention Confidential can Qualify as Prior Art

The United States Supreme Court held in Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al. (No. 17-1229, 2019) that inventor’s sale of an invention to a third party who is obligated to keep the invention confidential can qualify as prior art under section 102(a) of title 35 of the United States Code.  The Court reasoned that Congress did not alter the meaning of the phrase “on sale” when it enacted the America Invents Act, which precludes a person from obtaining a patent on an invention that was “in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.”  The patent statute in force immediately before the America Invents Act included an on-sale bar provision, as well.  The Supreme Court’s precedent interpreting that provision supports the view that a sale or offer for sale need not make an invention available to the public to constitute invalidating prior art.  The Court has implicitly held in precedents decided prior to the enactment of the America Invents Act that “secret sales” could invalidate a patent.

About the Author

Donika

15 Comments

800 pet meds

I’m not sure where you’re getting your information, but good topic.I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more.Thanks for wonderful information I was looking for thisinformation for my mission.

Reply
Harrison

Hello! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but after checking through some of the post I realized it’s new to me.
Nonetheless, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll be bookmarking
and checking back frequently!

Reply
Moses Wherley

I got this site from my pal who told me regarding this website and now thistime I am browsing this web page and reading veryinformative articles or reviews here.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.